The suicide bombing in a busy shopping district in downtown Istanbul on Saturday, March 19, was the second such attack in Turkey in the space of a week, and the fourth major terror attack in 2016. Rumours are a natural part of the grieving process, a way for people to make sense of the world around them, especially in times of risk or danger. But they can also be dangerously misleading, and are often used in unstable areas for political reasons, sowing fear and distrust among a population trying to come to terms with trauma.
Journalists and news organisations have a duty to investigate rumours, but also to report the truth. Here we hope to set the record straight on 10 rumours and falsehoods which spread in the wake of the recent attacks in Turkey.
Many outlets have the wrong photo of Istanbul bombing suspect Mehmet Öztürk
Turkish Interior Minister Efkan Ala identified Mehmet Öztürk as the main suspect in the March 19 bombing in Istanbul, linking him to Daesh. Officials did not release a photo as he previously had no police record. This hasn’t stopped many social media users and news organisations sharing the following photo, however, claiming it is Öztürk:
Mehmet Ozturk is believed to be a Turkish #ISIS member pic.twitter.com/PD8JXbgTSa
— Michael Horowitz (@michaelh992) March 20, 2016
The photo appears to come from an ID card identifying a Mohammed Zana, accused of plotting a terrorist attack in Turkey last October. Zana is also pictured on a government website listing wanted terrorists.
#Turkey‘s state-run news agency announced on 23 October 2015 the ID of #ISIL bomber, & said police was on lookout. pic.twitter.com/t1rNbRrR0A
— Abdullah Bozkurt (@abdbozkurt) March 20, 2016
There was no bomb in Nişantaşı
A couple of minutes after Saturday’s explosion on Istiklal street, İstanbul, a rumour spread on social media and some news outlets about another blast in the Nişantaşı area of Istanbul. Television and social media users published the photo below for the Nişantaşı allegation.
Except for a few tweets about this alleged new blast, there were no other clues. But this photo was from footage taken after an explosive gas leak in Istanbul from 2014. You can watch footage of the 2014 incident here, and while it’s not especially graphic some readers might find it distressing.
Daesh have not claimed responsibility for the March 13 attack
Although shared widely, the tweet below from broadcaster Zain Khan is baseless. Kurdish militants TAK have since claimed responsibility for the bombing in Ankara.
Turkish Minister of Education Nabi Avcı did not resign
The claim that minister Nabi Avcı resigned on Twitter, as pictured above, travelled far and wide on Facebook.
However, Avcı does not have an official Twitter account and @NabiAvci_MEB is a parody account. Twitter has suspended the parody and the Ministry of Education’s official Twitter account sent a tweet denying the resignation of the Minister.
Açılan hesaplar ile ilgili yasal işlem yapılacak olup bu tür hesaplar üzerinden yapılan açıklamalara itibar edilmemesini rica ederiz.
— MEB (@tcmeb) March 15, 2016
Hackers did not publish a secret list of planned PKK attacks
Just wrong. The list details the programme for Newroz 2016, announced by the People’s Democratic Party. Newroz, literally “New Day”, marks the start of the Iranian calendar year.
A man famously pictured reading books to Police during the Gezi Park protests is not the same as interviewed after the Ankara bomb
Shortly after the explosion in Ankara on March 13, Hayat TV interviewed a distraught citizen who shouted “your power, religion, wealth shall go to hell” in front of Numune Hospital, where many of the wounded were taken.
DİKKAT: bu kişiler neden aynı değil? dezenformasyon listesinin 16. maddesinde: https://t.co/d4SqubLYxS pic.twitter.com/9mOLkQviFX
— Mehmet Atakan Foça (@matakanfoca) March 16, 2016
News portals such as Akit and Haber 7 claimed the citizen in the video is the same individual as one of the book-reading protestors at Gezi Park demonstrations in 2013. This claim was spread widely by Turkish politician Melih Gökçek.
But the book-reading protestor from the picture is in fact Hasan Hüseyin, who was in Malta two hours before Hayat TV published the video at 22:50 on March 13th.
Huseyin’s social media posts are geo-tagged to Malta and, although this can be falsified, Hüseyin to confirmed his location on Facebook Messenger. He told Turkish news organisation T24 the same, and has since appealed for legal advice on the situation.
A video of protesters shouting ‘Thief murderer Erdogan’ is from October 11, not March 13
According to this Facebook post, video is recorded during a protest for Ankara bombing on March 13. However the video is from the protests after bombings near central train station, and is dated October 11th, 2015:
The picture of a young paper collector ‘killed’ in the March 13 bombing is two years old
Söylenecek söz yok.. pic.twitter.com/PnlbsyEiaP
— alpay ⚡️ (@alpaydemiiir) March 15, 2016
Despite the fact that there is a person called Muharrem Çermik listed among the dead, he was 80 years old. The photo of the paper collector child was used in March 15th, 2014.
The March 13 bomber is not a Cumhuriyet Newspaper reporter
Tweets about the claim are as follows:
Cumhuriyet Newspaper released a statement refuting the claims, saying “there has never been such a reporter from any region”.
One of the videos from Ankara is from February 17 blast
The video uploaded to YouTube claiming to capture the March 13 explosion has had more than 400,000 views, but it is actually a footage of February 17 blast shot from a different angle.
The footage of February 17 blast:
Update: This article has been updated to show that the recent bombing in Istanbul, on March 19, was the fourth major terror attack in Turkey in 2016, not the third, as this article originally stated; and the caption of CNN Turk, to clarify the discussion of the Nisantasi allegation and alleged photo with on screen graphics of the Istiklal street attack.