Covering extremism: a reading list
First Draft uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. They allow us to recognise users over multiple visits, and to collect basic data about your use of the website. Cookies help us provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site. Check our cookie policy to read more. Cookie Policy.

This website is hosted in perpetuity by the Internet Archive.

Covering extremism: a reading list

More than a month after the storming of the US Capitol, journalists covering white supremacy as a beat are still grappling with questions about how to report on the growing threat of far-right extremists and the disinformation they spread. In 2020 alone, intelligence and security agencies in the US Australia and the UK — to name a few — all sounded the alarm on violent far-right extremism, highlighting the issue’s increasing urgency.

While the reasons for the rise of extremism in recent years are complex, one issue First Draft and other organizations have identified is that established media outlets have sometimes inadvertently amplified extremist ideologies. Some may have thought that shining a light on extremism will help drive it away. However, reportage on extremists can also provide them with opportunities to game the media into repeating falsehoods. We saw this happen during the Christchurch terror attack; media amplification also helped propel QAnon conspiracy theories and election disinformation offered by the Trump administration far beyond their original audiences.

For journalists, researchers and editors, whether and how you cover extremism are important choices. We’ve compiled a reading list to help you make those decisions.

The role of journalism in covering extremism

If you’re looking for a one-stop shop for core tips and ideas, read Whitney Phillips’ The Oxygen of Amplification, which explains how reportage on bigoted and problematic information can exacerbate the issue of extremism. Phillips’s report, and the readings below, propose best practices for how journalists can protect the broader information and media ecosystems. 

Understanding extremists’ online tactics

To understand the digital tactics and strategies commonly used by extremists, it’s instructive to examine Gamergate, a 2014 online harassment campaign in the video game industry that opened the floodgates for the current culture of extremist rhetoric and harassment influencers. The New York Times’s Everything Is Gamergate offers a five-year retrospective on the campaign and its impact on the internet. 

Covering extremism without centering extremists

If you do choose to write about extremists, remember that it does not have to involve profiling individuals or groups, let alone publishing direct quotes from them. Rather, consider other angles, such as reporting on the financial incentives behind those ideologies. In Columbia Journalism Review’s feature Reporting on extremism, from those who have done it best, Ijeoma Oluo advised journalists to “flip the perspective” and cover the people affected by these figures: “When your only goal is to understand the dehumanizing, and not understanding the impact that this is having on the people who are being dehumanized, you’re continuing that cycle of dehumanization.”

The ‘view from nowhere’ and leaving neutrality behind

Established media and legacy journalism sometimes fall back on what Phillips identifies as “both sides-ism” — pitting opposing views against each other and thereby equalizing them, even if one side doesn’t have the facts and isn’t worth reporting on. Three years ago, the BBC dropped the practice when it came to climate change, circulating a briefing note that said reports did not need a climate science denier to balance the debate. These readings discuss the limitations of a “view from nowhere” and the question of “neutrality” and “objectivity” in the current political moment.

Keeping yourself safe

Finally, journalists and researchers should be aware they can face threats as a result of their work on extremist communities. There may be additional risks for reporters of color, women or queer journalists. Explore these readings for more risk assessment and digital security tips. 

Stay up to date with First Draft’s work by becoming a subscriber and following us on Facebook and Twitter.